Skip to main content
People & firms

The WONE Global Partners in each market.

Named senior professionals, each admitted as the one firm for a service in their country, and the firms they lead.

For professional firms

Lead your service in your market.

One Partner per service, per jurisdiction, admitted by review against published criteria.

Open Partnerships→
Insights

Sourced answers on doing business across borders.

Every statement is labelled: source-checked, professionally reviewed or not yet checked, with its source and date where checked.

Ask WONE Global

Ask your question.

Answers cite WONE Global's sourced statements and show how each one was checked. Research, not advice.

Ask WONE Global→

Service · Trade and deals

Transactions & Deals across borders

Buying, selling and investing across borders, from the first structure to closing and after. Led by a WONE Global Partner where one is named. Elsewhere, WONE Global confirms on request whether a vetted Associate firm can act.

17
markets with a named lead
60
featured markets covered
1
WONE Global standard

Professional knowledge centre

Transactions & Deals: how it works

Cross-border deals rarely fail on price; they slip on approvals, employees and taxes that differ country by country. A buyer must map every merger control and foreign investment filing triggered by either group's sales and activities, decide whether a share or asset structure works in each market, and plan for employees who move automatically in an asset sale. Recent changes have raised the stakes: India, Germany and COMESA now catch high-value deals for targets with low local turnover, the US HSR thresholds rose for 2026, France raised its merger thresholds from 1 September 2026, and the EU adopted a revised foreign investment screening regulation in June 2026. Takeover codes in the UK and Singapore were also amended in 2026.

Source-checked research99% of statements checked against a source88 checked against an official source17 checked against a secondary sourceChecked 2026-10-19Not yet professionally reviewed

Overview

6 modules

Approvals fall into two families. Merger control asks whether the deal harms competition and is triggered by turnover, assets, market share or deal value. Foreign investment screening asks whether the buyer or the target's activities raise security concerns, and is triggered by sector and shareholding with no turnover test. Both families are often suspensory, so the longest review sets the closing timetable.

Structure and people decisions follow. In an asset deal the EU Acquired Rights Directive, UK TUPE and Germany's section 613a move employees automatically; in a share deal transfer taxes may still apply, especially where the target owns real estate. For listed targets, takeover codes add mandatory offer thresholds from 25% to 40% and fixed timetables. The modules below compare the rules in India, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the UK, the US, Germany and France, with EU and COMESA instruments where they apply.

Merger control thresholds

31 statements, checked against sources

Merger control decides whether a deal must be cleared by competition authorities before it closes. Each regime has its own turnover, asset, market-share or deal-value tests, and several now catch acquisitions of targets with little local turnover but a high price. Most of the regimes covered here are suspensory, so closing before clearance can make the deal ineffective or attract fines of up to 10% of turnover. A multi-country deal needs a filing analysis for every country where either side has sales or assets, done before the timetable is fixed.

Read the full module →

Sources for this topic · 15
  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Competition — Mergers: ProceduresChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 4 statements
  • legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives) — Enterprise Act 2002, section 23Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Competition and Markets Authority — Mergers: Guidance on the CMA's jurisdiction and procedure (CMA2, December 2025 version)Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 3 statements
  • Federal Trade Commission (Federal Register document 2026-00877) — Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 7A of the Clayton ActChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 3 statements
  • Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School — 15 US Code 18a - Premerger notification and waiting periodChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • iPleaders — CCI merger control: deal value threshold and green channelChecked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Competition Commission of India — Fair Play, Volume 50 (CCI quarterly newsletter)Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 3 statements
  • Competition Commission of India — The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 2 statements
  • Chambers and Partners (GLA & Company) — Merger Control 2026: Saudi Arabia (Global Practice Guide, last updated 7 July 2026)Checked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 4 statements
  • Clyde & Co (law firm briefing) — A New Era for Regional Merger Control: The Impact of the COMESA Competition and Consumer Protection Regulations, 2025Checked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 3 statements
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 35 GWB – Geltungsbereich der ZusammenschlusskontrolleChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 2 statements
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 41 GWB – Vollzugsverbot, EntflechtungChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Autorité de la concurrence — Contrôle des concentrationsChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Ministry of Economy and Tourism — Cabinet Decision No. (3) of 2025 On the Thresholds Related to the Implementation of Federal Decree-Law No. (36) of 2023 Regulating CompetitionChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCS) — CCS Guidelines on Merger ProceduresChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement

Questions on this topic

31 statements on merger control thresholds

Foreign investment approval in deals

23 statements, checked against sources

Foreign investment screening runs alongside merger control but asks a different question: whether the buyer's identity or the target's activity raises national security or public order concerns. Thresholds are low (often 10% to 25% of votes), there is usually no turnover test, and several regimes make an unapproved deal void or provisionally ineffective. The EU adopted a revised screening regulation in June 2026 that will require every Member State to screen deals in core sensitive sectors once it applies.

Read the full module →

Sources for this topic · 16
  • Cabinet Office (Investment Security Unit) — National Security and Investment Act: guidance on acquisitionsChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 5 statements
  • Cabinet Office — Government Response to the Consultation on the Notifiable Acquisition Regulations (12 March 2026)Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 56 AWV – StimmrechtsanteileChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 55a AWV – Voraussichtliche Beeinträchtigung der öffentlichen Ordnung oder SicherheitChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 15 AWG – RechtsgeschäfteChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Direction générale du Trésor — Contrôle des investissements étrangers en FranceChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Direction générale du Trésor — Les conditions d'une opération soumise à autorisation préalableChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Direction générale du Trésor — Les pouvoirs de sanction du ministre chargé de l'ÉconomieChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Office of the Federal Register (eCFR) — 31 CFR 800.401 Mandatory declarationsChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School — 31 CFR 800.405 - Committee actionsChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Foreign Investment Facilitation Portal — FAQs on FDI PolicyChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 2 statements
  • Ministry of Investment (MISA) — Investment Law (official English translation, Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers)Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • Office of Significant Investments Review (OSIR) — Acquiring Equity Interest or Voting PowerChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • UAE Government Portal (u.ae) — Full foreign ownership of commercial companiesChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Debevoise & Plimpton (law firm briefing) — Revised EU FDI Screening Regulation AdoptedChecked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • Direction générale du Trésor — Publication du rapport annuel sur le contrôle IEF en 2025Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement

Questions on this topic

23 statements on foreign investment approval in deals

Share deals compared with asset deals

6 statements, checked against sources

In a share deal the buyer acquires the company that owns the business, so contracts, employees, licences and liabilities stay where they are. In an asset deal the buyer picks the assets and liabilities it wants, but each one has to be transferred, and employment and tax rules may move more than the parties intended. The choice affects transfer taxes, employee transfer rules, IP formalities and which approvals are needed, and the answer often differs country by country in the same deal.

Read the full module →

Sources for this topic · 6
  • Chambers and Partners (GLA & Company) — Merger Control 2026: Saudi Arabia (Global Practice Guide, last updated 7 July 2026)Checked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Bundeskartellamt — Obligation to notify a merger and key aspects of merger controlChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • GOV.UK — Business transfers, takeovers and TUPEChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School — 17 U.S. Code § 204 - Execution of transfers of copyright ownershipChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Service Public Entreprendre (DILA, Prime Minister's Office) — Contrat de cession de droits d'auteurChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Federal Trade Commission (Federal Register document 2026-00877) — Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 7A of the Clayton ActChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement

Questions on this topic

6 statements on share deals compared with asset deals

Employees on a sale

16 statements, checked against sources

When a business is sold as a going concern, employment protection rules in the EU and the UK move the employees, their terms and much of their history to the buyer automatically, and prevent dismissals because of the transfer. Information and consultation duties apply before completion and failures can be penalised. Outside Europe the rules are different and often less developed, so each country in a carve-out needs its own analysis.

Read the full module →

Sources for this topic · 12
  • legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives), EU-derived legislation — Council Directive 2001/23/EC, Article 1Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives), EU-derived legislation — Council Directive 2001/23/EC, Article 3Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives), EU-derived legislation — Council Directive 2001/23/EC, Article 4Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives), EU-derived legislation — Council Directive 2001/23/EC, Article 7Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • GOV.UK — Business transfers, takeovers and TUPEChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • GOV.UK — Business transfers, takeovers and TUPE: Transfers of employment contractsChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • GOV.UK — Business transfers, takeovers and TUPE: Consulting and informing employeesChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • GOV.UK — Business transfers, takeovers and TUPE: Information about employees during transfersChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) § 613a Rechte und Pflichten bei BetriebsübergangChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 3 statements
  • Légifrance — Code du travail, article L1224-1Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Taxmann (secondary publisher) — Govt. Notifies Nov. 21, 2025 for Enforcement of Industrial Relations Code, 2020Checked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • PRS Legislative Research — Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Bill text)Checked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement

Questions on this topic

16 statements on employees on a sale, 1 not yet checked against a source

Transfer taxes and stamp duty

13 statements, checked against sources

Transfer taxes are charged on the transfer itself, regardless of whether the seller makes a gain, and they often fall on the buyer. Share transfers usually attract lower rates than direct transfers of real estate, but several countries treat the sale of a property-rich company as a property transfer. Rates, payers and deadlines differ, and in India and Germany state-level rules add a further layer.

Read the full module →

Sources for this topic · 8
  • GOV.UK — Tax when you buy sharesChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — Grunderwerbsteuergesetz (GrEStG) § 11 Steuersatz, AbrundungChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — Grunderwerbsteuergesetz (GrEStG) § 1 ErwerbsvorgängeChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • Direction générale des Finances publiques (impots.gouv.fr) — Cession de droits sociauxChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 4 statements
  • Khaitan & Co (law firm note) — Amendments to the Indian Stamp Act - an overview of key changes impacting Merger and AcquisitionsChecked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries — India – Corporate – Other taxesChecked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority (ZATCA) — Guideline for Regional Headquarters in KSA, Second Version, May 2026Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries — Singapore - Corporate - Other taxesChecked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement

Questions on this topic

13 statements on transfer taxes and stamp duty

Public takeover rules

17 statements, checked against sources

Buying a listed company brings rules that do not apply to private deals: mandatory offers when a control threshold is crossed, minimum offer periods, disclosure of stakes and regulator approval of offer documents. The thresholds differ: 25% in India, 30% in the UK and Germany, 40% for private transactions in Saudi Arabia, and stake disclosure above 5% in the United States. Singapore amended its Code in July 2026 and the UK Code was amended in February 2026.

Read the full module →

Sources for this topic · 10
  • The Takeover Panel — The Takeover Code, Rule 9.1 When a mandatory offer is required and who is primarily responsible for making itChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • Wedlake Bell (law firm briefing) — Navigating the Takeover Code: key changes effective February 2026Checked against a secondary source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Securities and Exchange Board of India — SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011, amended up to 5 December 2025Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 4 statements
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 29 WpÜG – BegriffsbestimmungenChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 35 WpÜG – Verpflichtung zur Veröffentlichung und zur Abgabe eines AngebotsChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-18 · 1 statement
  • Capital Market Authority (CMA) — Merger and Acquisition Regulations (amended by CMA Board Resolution 8-5-2023 dated 18 January 2023)Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 3 statements
  • Capital Market Authority (CMA) — Rules for Foreign Investment in Securities (amended by CMA Board Resolution 1-2-2026 dated 5 January 2026)Checked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Monetary Authority of Singapore — MAS amends the Singapore Code on Take-overs and MergersChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 2 statements
  • Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School — 17 CFR § 240.13d-1 - Filing of Schedules 13D and 13GChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement
  • Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School — 17 CFR § 240.14e-1 - Unlawful tender offer practicesChecked against an official source · checked 2026-10-19 · 1 statement

Questions on this topic

17 statements on public takeover rules

Worked example, from official sources

Notification checks for a cross-border acquisition with sales in the UK, Germany, India and Saudi Arabia

A non-EU buyer is acquiring 100% of a private target group that sells in the UK, Germany, India and Saudi Arabia. Which merger control filings are needed, and which foreign investment approvals should be checked?

Assumptions

  • The buyer group is headquartered outside the EU and has combined worldwide turnover, with the target, below EUR 2,500 million, so neither EU Merger Regulation test is met.
  • Combined worldwide turnover exceeds EUR 500 million; the buyer group has German turnover of EUR 120 million and the target EUR 40 million.
  • The target's UK turnover is GBP 60 million, the buyer has UK turnover above GBP 10 million, the parties' combined UK share of supply is below 25%, and no party has a 33% share with UK turnover above GBP 350 million.
  • The target's Indian turnover is Rs 600 crore and its assets in India are below Rs 450 crore; its global turnover is equivalent to Rs 2,700 crore; the buyer has no Indian business; the parties are below India's asset and turnover thresholds; the consideration exceeds Rs 2,000 crore.
  • Combined worldwide sales exceed SAR 200 million, the target's worldwide sales exceed SAR 40 million, and the target sells SAR 80 million into Saudi Arabia.
  • The target has no sales in COMESA and does not carry on activities in any of the UK or German sensitive sectors. Figures are illustrative; currency conversions are not modelled.
Merger control outcome by country on the assumed facts1234567891011121314
CountryTest appliedFactsOutcomeOfficial or cited source
EUEUR 5,000m / EUR 2,500m worldwide testsCombined below EUR 2,500mNo EU dimension; national rules applyEuropean Commission, Mergers: Procedures
GermanyEUR 500m worldwide; EUR 50m and EUR 17.5m in GermanyEUR 120m and EUR 40m in GermanyNotifiable; standstill appliesBundeskartellamt; GWB
United KingdomTarget turnover over GBP 100m; 25% share of supply; hybrid testGBP 60m target turnover; share below 25%Outside CMA jurisdiction on these factsEnterprise Act 2002 s23; CMA guidance
IndiaSmall-target exemption; deal value over Rs 2,000 crore with substantial Indian operationsIndian turnover Rs 600 crore, about 22% of global and over Rs 500 crore; deal value over Rs 2,000 croreNotifiable under the deal-value thresholdCompetition Act s5(d); CCI Combinations Regulations 2024
Saudi ArabiaSAR 200m worldwide; SAR 40m target; SAR 40m SaudiSAR 80m Saudi sales from targetNotifiable at least 90 days before completion; fee 0.02% capped at SAR 250,000GAC rules (secondary summary)
COMESAUSD 60m combined in the Common MarketNo COMESA salesNot notifiableLaw-firm summary of 2025 Regulations

Step by step

  1. Start with the EU. Combined worldwide turnover is below EUR 2,500 million, so neither EU Merger Regulation test is met and the Commission has no jurisdiction; national regimes apply.12
  2. Germany: combined worldwide turnover exceeds EUR 500 million, the buyer has more than EUR 50 million and the target more than EUR 17.5 million in Germany, so the deal must be notified to the Bundeskartellamt and cannot be implemented before clearance.34
  3. United Kingdom: the target's UK turnover of GBP 60 million is below GBP 100 million, the share of supply is below 25% and the hybrid test is not met, so the CMA has no merger jurisdiction on these facts. The GBP 10 million safe harbour does not apply because the buyer has UK turnover above GBP 10 million, so the share of supply estimate must be robust.56715
  4. India: the target is within the small-target exemption, which would normally remove the filing, but the deal value exceeds Rs 2,000 crore and the target's Indian turnover is at least 10% of its global turnover and above Rs 500 crore, so it has substantial business operations in India and the deal is notifiable. The CCI must form a prima facie view within 30 days of notice.891016
  5. Saudi Arabia: combined worldwide sales exceed SAR 200 million, the target's worldwide sales exceed SAR 40 million and Saudi sales of SAR 80 million come from the target, so the deal must be filed with GAC at least 90 days before completion, with a fee of 0.02% of combined annual sales capped at SAR 250,000.111213
  6. Foreign investment: check the UK NSI Act sectors (a non-notified deal can be called in for up to five years), Germany's cross-sector review at 25% for non-EU buyers, India's government route if any beneficial owner is linked to a land-border country, and Saudi Ministry of Investment approval if the target carries on a restricted activity.1718192021

Conditions that apply

  • Turnover and sales must be calculated at group level under each regime's rules for the last financial year.311
  • India's deal value includes direct, indirect, immediate and deferred consideration; if it cannot be established with reasonable certainty the threshold is treated as met.9
  • Closing before clearance is barred in Germany and Saudi Arabia, and penalties apply in India for failure to notify.4122223
  • If the target were active in a sensitive UK sector, a mandatory NSI filing would be needed and completion without approval would be void.1724

Result on these facts

On these facts three filings are needed: Germany, India (through the deal-value test) and Saudi Arabia, with Saudi Arabia's 90-day pre-completion filing likely to set the earliest closing date. There is no EU dimension, no CMA jurisdiction and no COMESA filing. Foreign investment filings depend on the target's activities and the buyer's ownership chain and must be checked separately.

Confirm turnover figures under each regime's calculation rules, the current Saudi GAC guidelines (the figures here come from a secondary practice guide), the UK share of supply and whether a voluntary CMA briefing is advisable, and any national rules in other countries where either group has sales.

Sources for the worked example

Each statement is numbered to the source it was checked against. We use official sources where we can, and each statement says whether it was checked against an official or a secondary source. Sources last checked on 19 October 2026. None of it has been professionally reviewed yet: it is research checked against official and secondary sources by WONE Global, not legal or tax advice.

  1. A concentration has an EU dimension where the combined worldwide turnover of all undertakings concerned exceeds EUR 5,000 million and at least two of them each have EU-wide turnover above EUR 250 million. Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004, Article 1(2). Not met if each undertaking achieves more than two-thirds of its EU-wide turnover in one and the same Member State.

    European Commission, Directorate-General for Competition — Mergers: Procedures · Thresholds, first alternative · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

  2. A concentration also has an EU dimension where combined worldwide turnover exceeds EUR 2,500 million, combined turnover exceeds EUR 100 million in each of at least three Member States, at least two undertakings each have more than EUR 25 million in each of those three Member States, and at least two each have EU-wide turnover above EUR 100 million. Article 1(3) of Regulation 139/2004. The same two-thirds rule applies.

    European Commission, Directorate-General for Competition — Mergers: Procedures · Thresholds, second alternative · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

  3. A concentration must be notified to the Bundeskartellamt if, in the last business year, the parties' combined worldwide turnover exceeded EUR 500 million, one party had German turnover above EUR 50 million and another party had German turnover above EUR 17.5 million. All three conditions must be met. Concentrations with an EU dimension are reviewed by the European Commission instead.

    Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 35 GWB – Geltungsbereich der Zusammenschlusskontrolle · § 35(1) GWB · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from de-transactions-001.

  4. A notifiable merger may not be implemented before clearance or expiry of the review periods, and transactions that breach this prohibition are legally ineffective. Exceptions include land transactions entered in the land register and corporate measures entered in the commercial register, and cases later resolved under § 41(1) sentence 3 GWB.

    Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 41 GWB – Vollzugsverbot, Entflechtung · § 41(1) GWB · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from de-transactions-005.

  5. The CMA has jurisdiction over a merger where the UK turnover of the target exceeds £100 million. Threshold in force from 1 January 2025 under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 amendments.

    legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives) — Enterprise Act 2002, section 23 · Section 23(1)(b) · In force from 1 January 2025 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from gb-transactions-007.

  6. The share of supply test is met where the merging parties together supply or acquire 25% or more of goods or services of a particular description in the UK or a substantial part of it, the merger increases that share, and at least one party has UK turnover above £10 million.

    Competition and Markets Authority — Mergers: Guidance on the CMA's jurisdiction and procedure (CMA2, December 2025 version) · Paragraphs 4.61 and 4.67 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from gb-transactions-008.

  7. A hybrid test gives the CMA jurisdiction where one party supplies or acquires at least 33% of goods or services of any description in the UK and has UK turnover above £350 million, and another party has a UK nexus. Designed to catch acquisitions of small or pre-revenue targets by large firms. In force from 1 January 2025.

    Competition and Markets Authority — Mergers: Guidance on the CMA's jurisdiction and procedure (CMA2, December 2025 version) · Paragraph 4.3(b)(iii) · In force from 1 January 2025 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from gb-transactions-009.

  8. Under the Competition (Minimum Value of Assets or Turnover) Rules 2024, a combination does not need to be notified where the target has assets in India of not more than Rs 450 crore or turnover in India of not more than Rs 1,250 crore. Small target (de minimis) exemption; does not apply where the deal value threshold is met.

    Competition Commission of India — Fair Play, Volume 50 (CCI quarterly newsletter) · Page 10 · In force from 7 March 2024 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Effective date from secondary source; the CCI newsletter gives the figures but not the date. Reused from in-transactions-002.

  9. A transaction whose value exceeds Rs 2,000 crore is notifiable to the CCI where the target has substantial business operations in India. Section 5(d) of the Competition Act inserted by the Competition (Amendment) Act 2023; in force from 10 September 2024; applies even where the small target exemption would otherwise apply. Value includes direct, indirect, immediate and deferred consideration; if it cannot be established with reasonable certainty the threshold is deemed met.

    Competition Commission of India — Fair Play, Volume 50 (CCI quarterly newsletter) · Pages 5 to 7 and 37 · In force from 10 September 2024 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Also confirmed in the Competition (Amendment) Act 2023 on the CCI website. Reused from in-transactions-003.

  10. A target has substantial business operations in India if, for digital services, 10% or more of its global users are in India, or, for other businesses, its Indian gross merchandise value or turnover is 10% or more of the global figure and above Rs 500 crore. CCI (Combinations) Regulations 2024, in force 10 September 2024. The Rs 500 crore floor does not apply to digital services.

    Competition Commission of India — Fair Play, Volume 50 (CCI quarterly newsletter) · Page 7 · In force from 10 September 2024 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Measurement periods for users, GMV and turnover are set in the Regulations and were not verified here. Reused from in-transactions-004.

  11. An economic concentration must be notified to the General Authority for Competition (GAC) where the participating undertakings' combined worldwide annual sales exceed SAR 200 million, the target's worldwide annual sales exceed SAR 40 million and the parties' combined sales in Saudi Arabia exceed SAR 40 million. The target must contribute to the Saudi sales figure. For mergers and joint ventures, at least two parties must each have worldwide sales above SAR 40 million. The combined threshold was raised from SAR 100 million by a GAC decision of 15 March 2023.

    Chambers and Partners (GLA & Company) — Merger Control 2026: Saudi Arabia (Global Practice Guide, last updated 7 July 2026) · Sections on jurisdictional thresholds (Implementing Regulations Article 12(1)) · In force from 15 March 2023 · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against a secondary source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Secondary (law firm) source; GAC's website and the Bureau of Experts legislation portal block automated access, so GAC's implementing regulations and guidelines could not yet be checked. Reused from sa-transactions-g01.

  12. A notifiable concentration must be filed with GAC at least 90 days before completion and may not close until GAC approves it in writing, unless GAC's 90-day review period, which starts when the filing is complete, lapses without a decision. The review period can be suspended while GAC requests information; lapse of the period is treated as approval.

    Chambers and Partners (GLA & Company) — Merger Control 2026: Saudi Arabia (Global Practice Guide, last updated 7 July 2026) · Review timetable and suspensory effect · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against a secondary source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Secondary (law firm) source; GAC's website and the Bureau of Experts legislation portal block automated access, so GAC's implementing regulations and guidelines could not yet be checked. Reused from sa-transactions-g02.

  13. The GAC filing fee is 0.02% of the total annual sales of the undertakings participating in the concentration, capped at SAR 250,000.

    Chambers and Partners (GLA & Company) — Merger Control 2026: Saudi Arabia (Global Practice Guide, last updated 7 July 2026) · Section 3.3 (filing fee) · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against a secondary source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Secondary (law firm) source; GAC's website and the Bureau of Experts legislation portal block automated access, so GAC's implementing regulations and guidelines could not yet be checked. Reused from sa-transactions-g03.

  14. Under the COMESA Competition and Consumer Protection Regulations 2025, a merger is notifiable where the combined annual turnover or asset value of all parties in the COMESA Common Market equals or exceeds USD 60 million and at least two parties each have turnover or assets of USD 10 million or more in the Common Market. COMESA regional regime. Not notifiable where each party achieves at least two-thirds of its aggregate turnover or assets in one and the same Member State. The previous combined threshold was USD 50 million.

    Clyde & Co (law firm briefing) — A New Era for Regional Merger Control: The Impact of the COMESA Competition and Consumer Protection Regulations, 2025 · Notification thresholds · In force from 5 December 2025 · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against a secondary source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Secondary source: the official COMESA Competition Commission text could not yet be checked, and a second law-firm briefing (DLA Piper) could not yet be checked because the site returned HTTP 429. Confirm against the Regulations and Rules as published by the COMESA Competition Commission.

  15. No relevant merger situation arises if none of the enterprises concerned has UK turnover above £10 million (small merger safe harbour).

    Competition and Markets Authority — Mergers: Guidance on the CMA's jurisdiction and procedure (CMA2, December 2025 version) · Paragraphs 4.62 and 4.63 · In force from 1 January 2025 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from gb-transactions-010.

  16. The CCI must form a prima facie opinion on a combination within thirty days of notice, and a combination is deemed approved if no order is passed within one hundred and fifty days of notice. Sections 29(1B), 6(2A) and 31(6) of the Competition Act as amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act 2023 (previously 210 days).

    Competition Commission of India — The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 · Sections 7(b), 21(b) and 23(d) of the amending Act · In force from 10 September 2024 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Commencement date for these provisions per CCI Fair Play Volume 50. Reused from in-transactions-005.

  17. Acquisitions of certain entities active in 17 sensitive areas of the economy, including defence, energy and transport, must be notified to and approved by the government before completion under the National Security and Investment Act 2021. Applies regardless of the acquirer's nationality, including UK acquirers. There is no turnover threshold.

    Cabinet Office (Investment Security Unit) — National Security and Investment Act: guidance on acquisitions · Mandatory notification · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from gb-transactions-001.

  18. The government can call in a non-notified acquisition for assessment up to 5 years after it took place, and within 6 months of becoming aware of it. Applies to qualifying acquisitions that were not notified.

    Cabinet Office (Investment Security Unit) — National Security and Investment Act: guidance on acquisitions · Call-in power · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from gb-transactions-004.

  19. Under the Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance (AWV), a non-EU acquirer's direct or indirect voting share in a German company triggers cross-sector investment review at 10% for the most sensitive categories in § 55a(1) nos. 1–7, 20% for categories nos. 8–27, and 25% for all other companies. Further acquisitions are reviewable when the holding reaches 20%, 25%, 40%, 50% or 75% (depending on category). Atypical control through board seats, vetoes or information rights is treated as reaching the threshold.

    Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz / Bundesamt für Justiz (gesetze-im-internet.de) — § 56 AWV – Stimmrechtsanteile · § 56(1)–(3) AWV · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from de-transactions-007.

  20. An entity of a country sharing a land border with India, or an investment whose beneficial owner is linked to such a country, can invest only under the government route, and a later transfer that brings beneficial ownership within this category also needs government approval. Press Note 3 (2020 Series) dated 17 April 2020, as revised in 2026; subject to the 10% non-controlling exception in in-establish-004. Central rule.

    Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Foreign Investment Facilitation Portal — FAQs on FDI Policy · Land-border countries (Press Note 3, 2020) · In force from 17 April 2020 · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    The FAQ uses the 2020 wording (beneficial owner situated in or a citizen of such a country). Secondary sources report that Press Note 2 (2026 Series) dated 15 March 2026 removed the 'situated in' limb so the test now turns on citizens and entities of those countries; the official Press Note text could not yet be checked. Reused from in-establish-003.

  21. A foreign investor must obtain MISA's approval before engaging in an activity on the list of excluded activities, and before a change in ownership of an investment in a restricted activity. Activities on the list of excluded (prohibited or restricted) activities.

    Ministry of Investment (MISA) — Investment Law (official English translation, Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers) · Articles 1, 8(2) and 8(3) · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from sa-transactions-g13.

  22. Failing to notify a concentration or closing before clearance can be fined up to 10% of total annual sales, or up to SAR 10 million where sales cannot be estimated. GAC fined each party SAR 400,000 in a 2024 case for implementing a notifiable concentration without notification. A settlement route can impose up to three times the gains from the violation.

    Chambers and Partners (GLA & Company) — Merger Control 2026: Saudi Arabia (Global Practice Guide, last updated 7 July 2026) · Penalties · Checked 19 October 2026 · Checked against a secondary source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Secondary (law firm) source; GAC's website and the Bureau of Experts legislation portal block automated access, so GAC's implementing regulations and guidelines could not yet be checked. Reused from sa-transactions-g04.

  23. Failure to notify a notifiable combination can attract a penalty of up to one per cent of the total turnover or assets, or of the value of the transaction, whichever is higher. Section 43A of the Competition Act as substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act 2023.

    Competition Commission of India — The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 · Section 30 of the amending Act (substituting section 43A) · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from in-transactions-007.

  24. A notifiable acquisition completed without approval is void. Civil and criminal penalties can also apply; civil penalties of up to 5% of worldwide turnover or £10 million, whichever is greater.

    Cabinet Office (Investment Security Unit) — National Security and Investment Act: guidance on acquisitions · If you do not notify · Checked 18 October 2026 · Checked against an official source · Not yet professionally reviewed

    Reused from gb-transactions-003.

WONE Global Intelligence

Ask about transactions & deals

Ask in your own words. Answers come from WONE Global's checked records, with every source shown, and end with the named Partner who can act. Go deeper on any point, or build a decision file.

Scope

What the service covers

  1. 01Define the transaction structure
  2. 02Coordinate legal, tax, financial and commercial diligence
  3. 03Manage signing and closing work
  4. 04Plan post-closing implementation and integration

Key questions

What we will work through with you

  • What needs to be decided before transactions & deals work starts?
  • Who is professionally responsible in each country?
  • Which other work, such as tax or employment, must happen at the same time?
  • What information and decisions are needed from the business?

You don’t need the answers before you talk to us. Working through them is the first thing we do together.

Coverage

Transactions & Deals, market by market

A named WONE Global lead in 17 markets today. In every other featured market, WONE Global arranges qualified local expertise on request and tells you who it is before work begins.

All 60 featured markets for Transactions & Deals +

WONE Global Partners

The professionals admitted for Transactions & Deals

Each is responsible for this service in their own jurisdiction, under their own professional rules.

Roberto GilardinoShanghai · China

WONE Global Partner · China

Roberto Gilardino

Regional Partner North Asia & additional countries · Horizons (Shanghai) Corporate Advisory Company · Shanghai

Roberto Gilardino is Regional Partner at Horizons, supervising the advisory’s activities in North Asia as well as additional countries (including Mongolia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, UAE, Cyprus and Malta).

Katherin Diaz VelillaBogotá · Colombia

WONE Global Partner · Colombia

Katherin Diaz Velilla

Complete profile

Co-Founder · V&V Associates · Bogotá

<span style="color: #000000;font-size: medium">International tax attorney and strategic advisor with 12+ years across Colombia\\\'s DIAN, Ministry of Finance, Senate, Presidency, and EY. Co-founder of V&V Asociados. Spe…

Karin HorevTel Aviv · Israel

WONE Global Partner · Israel

Karin Horev

Founding Partner · Horev & Co. Law Office · Tel Aviv

Adv. Karin Horev has been practicing corporate and commercial law for more than 20 years, with a focus on complex technology-related matters. Over the years, Karin has led a large number of complex and wide-ranging tran…

Miguel Angel Asencio AsencioMexico City · Mexico

WONE Global Partner · Mexico

Miguel Angel Asencio Asencio

Complete profile

Founder, Managing Partner · Summare Capital Solutions SC · Mexico City

<p style="line-height: normal;margin-top: 0pt;margin-bottom: 0pt;margin-left: .2in;text-indent: -.19in;text-align: left;direction: ltr"><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;font-family: Arial;color: #415364">Miguel has more t…

Ebrahim Asvat K.Panamá · Panama

WONE Global Partner · Panama

Ebrahim Asvat K.

Managing Partner · Patton, Moreno & Asvat · Panamá

Ebrahim Asvat K. is a founding partner of Patton, Moreno & Asvat. His practice focuses on corporate law, asset and tax planning, mergers and acquisitions, and offshore business structures. He holds an LL.M. from Harvard…

Reagan Blankfein GatesLusaka · Zambia

WONE Global Partner · Zambia

Reagan Blankfein Gates

Complete profile

Managing Partner · Reagan Blankfein Gates Legal Practitioners · Lusaka

Reagan started his career in practice at Mainza & Company where he had interned while pursuing a bar qualification at the Zambia Institute of Advanced Legal Education (ZIALE) in 2008. Upon being called to the bar, Reaga…

Who does what

Clear responsibility at every step

WONE Global is not a law, tax or audit firm. Each firm is independent and regulated where it practises.

  1. WONE GlobalWorks out what you need, finds the right firm, checks it can act and coordinates work that crosses borders.
  2. The named firmGives the advice and does the work under its own licence and insurance, and invoices you for it.
  3. YouAgree the scope and fees directly with the firm before any work starts, and can choose another firm at any time.

How professional responsibility works →

Contact WONE Global

Transactions & Deals in one country or several.